Legal Opinion
Tate Access Floors, Inc. And Tate Access Floors Leasing, Inc. v. Interface Architectural Resources, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 7, 2002No. 01-1275PublishedCited by 142 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
The Defendant-Appellant, Interface Architectural Resources, Inc. (“Interface”), seeks review of a final judgment by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland granting a motion by the Plaintiff-Appellees, Tate Access Floors, Inc. and Tate Access Floors Leasing, Inc. (together “Tate”) to preliminarily enjoin Interface from infringing claims 1-4 and 8-10 of United States Patent No. 4,625,491 (the “'491 patent”). Interface contends that the district court erred by granting the preliminary injunction because Tate failed to make the requisite showing of a…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Oakley, Inc. v. Sunglass Hut International, Lenscrafters, Inc., Ray Ban Sun Optics, Luxottica Group S.P.A., and Leonardo Del VecchioCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Apex Inc. v. Raritan Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.