Legal Opinion
Apex Inc. v. Raritan Computer, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 29, 2003No. 02-1303PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant, Apex Inc. (“Apex”), seeks review of the final judgment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York holding that United States Patent Nos. 5,884,096 (“the '096 patent”), 5,937,176 (“the '176 patent”), and 6,112,264 (“the '264 patent”) (collectively “the patents”) were not infringed and dismissing all of Defendant-Appel-lee’s, Raritan Computer, Inc. (“Raritan”), counterclaims without prejudice. Apex Inc. v. Raritan Computer, Inc., 187 F.Supp.2d 141 (S.D.N.Y.2002). Because the district court erred as a matter of law in the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Actv, Inc. And Hypertv Networks, Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., and Espn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Lighting World, Inc. v. Birchwood Lighting, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.