Legal Opinion
Seaphus v. Lilly
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 6, 1988No. 87 C 10085PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
This order concerns defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s pro se complaint for failure to state a cause of action. For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted. Plaintiff is given leave to file an amended complaint (within 45 days of the date of this order) under conditions set forth below. An order appointing plaintiff counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 will follow.
Plaintiff filed a 55-page pro se complaint in late 1987 alleging a litany of purported state and federal claims against individuals who at one time lived in neighboring…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Martin v. AubuchonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Roger Asay v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Vantassell-Matin v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service, Inc. v. BabinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
- Stirgus v. BenoitDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Whisby-Myers v. KiekenappDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Lawrence v. Courtyards at Deerwood Ass'n, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.