Legal Opinion
Lawrence v. Courtyards at Deerwood Ass'n, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided May 11, 2004No. 03-21614-CIVHUCKPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS
HUCK, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Amended Motion for Summary Judgment [DE# 66] filed by The Courtyards at Deerwood Association, Inc. and Miami Management, Inc (collectively “Defendants”) on March 22, 2004. The Defendants are entitled to summary judgment because the material facts are undisputed and the claims brought pursuant to the Federal Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq., and the Civil Rights Act (“CRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1982, fail as a matter of law for several reasons.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Haber v. ASN 50th St. LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Noah v. AssorDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
- Long v. ARONOV REALTY MANAGEMENT, INC.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009
- United States v. KochDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2004
- Francis v. Kings Park Manor, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.