Legal Opinion

Continental Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hutton

California Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1904No. Sac. No. 1074PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

In this action the plaintiff sought to foreclose a mortgage upon certain real estate in the town of Vacaville, county of Solano. The cross-complainants, Corlett Brothers, in the same action sought to enforce a mechanics’ lien on the same property against the defendant Charlotte A. Hutton, the owner of said property. The said cross-complainants had judgment enforcing their lien for $1,425. The defendant Hutton appeals from said judgment and from an order denying her a new trial. The questions presented relate alone to the validity of the notice of lien filed by said Corlett Brothers.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Snell v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Chatsworth Park, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Hammond Lumber Co. v. Barth Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hammond Lumber Co. v. Barth Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Fredericksen v. HarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Jarvis v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API