May v. Roadway Express, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Paper No. 21. The motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision. Upon review of the pleadings and applicable case law, the Court finds that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6) and the motion will be granted.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Richard P. May, has been employed by Defendant Roadway Express, Inc. since October 8, 1984. His duties consist of driving a truck and making deliveries, primarily within the vicinity of Baltimore City. The work is physically demanding, requiring…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davis v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Crow v. McElroy Coal Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2003
- Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Mohammadian v. Ciba Vision of Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- Nguyen v. YellenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.