Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Republic Acceptance Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1965No. A-10568PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

The opinion by the majority in the Court of Civil Appeals has correctly held that a promissory note payable “in Austin” is a contract in writing that is performable in Travis County, Texas. Republic Acceptance Corporation v. Thompson, 384 S.W.2d 792. The opinion is subject to the interpretation, however, that one who relies upon subdivision 5, Article 1995, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., need not introduce into evidence the written document relied upon. The writing relied upon must be proved. The fact that defendant Thompson did not deny execution under oath excused proof of execution, but the terms…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mays v. PierceTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. City of Deer Park v. State ex rel. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Able v. ChandlerTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Davis v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Republic Acceptance Corp. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. Nielson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  2. Roberson Farm Equipment Company v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Southwestern Investment Company v. ShipleyTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Preston State Bank v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. VanHuss v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API