Davis v. Marshall
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Panola. Tried below before the Hon. C. A. Frazer. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for the amount sued for on the note. There was no assignment of errors filed by the plaintiff in error. The other facts are stated in the opinion with sufficient fullness.
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
This was a suit by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error on a promissory note. The defendant in the court below denied all the allegations of the petition of the plaintiffs, and filed also special pleas. The statement of facts shows that evidence was introduced by the defendant in support of his special pleas, but does not show that the plaintiffs offered any evidence in support of the allegations of their petition. It is not shown that the note sued on was read in evidence. .The case is submitted upon a suggestion of delay by the defendants in error, and we therefore notice…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matossy v. FroshTexas Supreme Court · 1853
- Able v. ChandlerTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Bond v. MallowTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Kinnard v. HerlockTexas Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thompson v. Republic Acceptance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Williamson v. City of EastlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Cheatham v. . CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- MacH v. WoffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Mo. Pac. R'y Co. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.