Legal Opinion

Republic Acceptance Corp. v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1964No. 11246PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

The note upon which this suit was based, copy of which is attached to plaintiff’s petition, is dated, “Houston, Texas, November 28, 1962,” and is payable “In Austin.”

The Supreme Court in Burtis v. Butler Bros., 148 Tex. 543, 226 S.W.2d 825, answered the following certified question in the affirmative:

“Since Exhibit B shows on its face that it was executed in Texas, are the words ‘All bills payable in Dallas’ sufficient to designate Dallas as a definite place in Dallas County, Texas, and fix the venue of this suit in Dallas County, within the terms of Subdivision 5 of Article…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ladner v. Reliance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Burtis v. Butler Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Republic Acceptance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Carolyn Barnes v. University Federal Credit Union and Government Employees Insurance Company/GEICO Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  3. David Ruiz Caballero Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API