Legal Opinion

Carmichael v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 23, 2005No. 99-958CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

FUTEY, Judge.

This military pay case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on Counts II and III of plaintiffs complaint, following a remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit). As part of its remand instruction, the Federal Circuit carved-out four factors to guide this court’s analysis. The Federal Circuit stated:

We therefore remand for a hearing to determine Carmichael’s claim. The trial court must determine whether at the time Carmichael sought religious accommodation, the Navy “wrongfully” failed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Wisotsky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Carmichael v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API