Legal Opinion
Lucille B. Woodbury, of the Estate of Ray B. Woodbury, Deceased v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 15, 1966No. 127-61PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
This suit is for breach of an alleged contract with the Housing and Home Finance Agency (HHFA), formerly an independent agency of the United States (now merged into the Department of Housing and Urban Development). Plaintiff 1 charges that in April 1954 HHFA became party to an agreement to facilitate the completion of a housing project in Kodiak, Alaska; that the United States thereby assumed a contractual . obligation either to implement and carry out the existing federally-supported arrangements for long-term financing or to provide alternative means for such financing; and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Ray B. Woodbury v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Ferroline Corp. v. General AniLine & Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Porter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- DeMauro Constr. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Angstrohm Precision, Inc. v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Wells v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.