DeMauro Constr. Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
This case, which concerns the construction of the Tengan Dam in Okinawa, is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendant contends that the court lacks jurisdiction because the suit properly should be brought by DeMauro against the government of Japan, not the government of the United States. Plaintiff argues, conversely, that it contracted with the United States. We agree with plaintiff and find that the involved contract has been breached.
To clarify the positions of the parties, we are including some background information regarding the American occupation of the Ryukyus.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Porter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- New York Shipbuilding Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Cobb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Juanita Burna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Slattery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- L'Enfant Plaza Properties, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Ains, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Convery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Fischbach & Moore International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.