Legal Opinion

Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern R. R. v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 13, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hobson

Affirming.

The Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern Railway Company was indicted by the grand jury of Ohio conntv for the offense of maintaining a common nuisance by obstructing a public road. It demurred to the indictment; its demurrer was overruled. Proof was heard. The court overruled its motion to instruct the jury peremp*257torily to find for the defendant; and the ease having been submitted to the jury, they found it guilty as charged and fixed its punishment at a fine of $250. From the- judgment entered on the verdict, it appeals.

The first question made on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. Ill. Cent. R. R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Joy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. State v. AusMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Newton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API