Legal Opinion

Ill. Cent. R. R. v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 3, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 93 — PROSECUTION AGAINST ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY FOR SUFFERING A NUISANCE ON ITS PROPERTY. Appeal from Graves Circuit Court. R. J. Bugg, Circuit Judge. Defendant convicted and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Lassing

Affirm-

ing-

Appellant was indicted, 0tried, and found guilty of suffering a common nuisance to be and remain upon its property. A fine of $100 was imposed, and, to reverse the judgment predicated thereon, this appeal is prosecuted.

Two grounds are relied upon for reversal: First, that the indictment is defective; and, second, that there is a failure of -evidence to show that the bridge in question is upon appellant’s right of way. Other objections are urged, but the real contentions of appellant are covered by the foregoing. The offense charged is that of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paducah & Elizabethtown R. R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
  2. Blue Grass Traction Co. v. GroverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Commonwealth v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MunceyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. City of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern R. R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API