Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 6, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Bell Circuit Court..

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller

Affirming.

The appellant was indicted at the November term of the Bell Circuit Court, under section 780 of the Kentucky Statutes, for its failure to block a frog of its railroad track at a point on its main track in Middlesboro opposite a building formerly occupied by the Norton Hardware Company, so as to prevent the feet of its employes from being caught in said frog. Upon a trial, the jury imposed a fine of $100; and from the judgment upon that verdict, the defendant appeals.

In its brief, appellant assigns three grounds for a reversal; (1) the trial court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Morse v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Robinson v. CarltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  4. Acme Mills & Elevator Co. v. RivesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Cawein v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GlassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Cunliffe v. ChumblerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API