Legal Opinion

Illinois Central Railroad v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 29, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Larue Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Eeversing.

The railroad company was indicted by the grand jury of Larne county for an alleged violation of section 772, of the Kentucky Statutes providing that ‘ ‘ every company operating a railroad in this State shall provide a convenient and suitable waiting room.”

The indictment charged that the railroad company, “within twelve months before the finding of this indictment, did unlawfully and wilfully fail, neglect and refuse to provide a suitable waiting room at its depot in Hodgenville, an incorporated town of the sixth class; that said waiting room in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern R. R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Plummer v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Ward v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Commonwealth v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Wilson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API