Legal Opinion
Washington v. Arapahoe County Department of Social Services
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 30, 2000No. Civ.A. 00-B-196PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOLAND, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before me on defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Expert Wit*440nesses (the “Motion to Strike”), filed October 10, 2000. The plaintiffs have filed a response in opposition. The Motion to Strike is DENIED.
The Scheduling Order that was entered in this case on June 13, 2000, contains the following disclosure requirement with respect to plaintiffs’ experts:
Plaintiffs shall designate all experts (including all treating health care providers who will testify as experts on causation and/or prognosis) and provide opposing counsel with all…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gestetner Corp. v. Case Equipment Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1985
- Summers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad SystemCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Baker v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Sprague v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
- Bucher v. Gainey Transportation Service of Indiana, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Pete v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
- Starling v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc. v. Universal American Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2014
- Perez v. Denver Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
- Garcia v. City of Springfield Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.