Legal Opinion
Starling v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 13, 2001No. 99-4181-JPOPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
O’HARA, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction.
This is an action under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60. Plaintiff Everett L. Starling claims that on July 2, 1997, in the course of his employment as a train conductor for defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (Union Pacific), he was injured when the *471locomotive on which he was working collided with another train on a railroad siding west of Topeka, Kansas. Plaintiff claims that, as a result of the train collision, he injured his back and also that he now suffers from post-traumatic…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Downey v. Bob's Discount Furniture Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Jesse A. Fielden v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. PHL Variable Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Parker v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. GardnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.