Legal Opinion

Spalding v. Bennett

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1928No. Docket No. 3536PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for broker’s commissions for procuring a fifty-year lease of real property.

The complaint contains two counts, the first of which is based upon an alleged oral promise to pay a specified sum for services for procuring the lease, while the second count claims compensation upon a quantum meruit. The transaction is not within the provisions of the statute of frauds, since it was neither an agreement to purchase nor sell real estate, which, in the absence of a memorandum in writing, is prohibited by section 1624 of the Civil Code and section…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Arnold v. La Belle Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Rucker v. HumblerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Edwards v. BillowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Beazell v. KaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Wright v. BuzzineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Woolley v. WycoffUtah Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API