Legal Opinion

Longwell v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1985No. 84-224PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Chief Justice.

Daniel Longwell, the appellant, articulates the sole issue presented to the court in this case in this way:

“Whether the trial court abused its discretion in revoking Daniel Longwell’s probation?”

In the light of well established precedent in Wyoming with respect to this issue, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking probation in the circumstances of this case. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Daniel Longwell was convicted upon his pleas of guilty of three counts of forgery as defined in § 6-3-602(a)(ii), W.S.1977 (1983…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ketcham v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Minchew v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. ReischWyoming Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cooney v. Park CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kupec v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Pino v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Swackhammer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Wlodarczyk v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API