Legal Opinion

Kupec v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1992No. 91-194PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Chief Justice.

Appellant Gloria Mae Kupec appeals from the lower court’s order revoking her probation and reinstating her original sentence.

We affirm.

Appellant states the issues as follows:

I. Whether the district court erred by allowing hearsay testimony at Appellant’s probation revocation hearing on the issue of whether a condition of probation was violated?

II. Whether the district court erred by allowing evidence of the urinalysis without an established chain of custody?

III. Whether the district court judge erred in finding a violation when he relied solely on the breathalyzer result…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. SpeaksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. KristonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Renfro v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Gailey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Mapp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API