Swackhammer v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
In this appeal, Jason Swackhammer challenges the sufficiency of the evidence presented at a probation revocation hearing to justify the order revoking his probation. A collateral issue is raised attacking the use of testimony reporting hearsay at the revocation hearing. In addition, the justification for revocation because of Swack-hammer’s departure from the state of Wyoming while awaiting transportation to the state penitentiary is challenged. We hold that no violation of Swackhammer’s rights of due process as a probationer occurred because of the testimony reporting hearsay…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Lower v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Ketcham v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gailey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Mapp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Kupec v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.