Pino v. State

CARDINE, Justice.

Appellant challenges his conviction for delivery of marijuana. He contends that the jury should not have been allowed to play an audio recording during deliberations and that because of alleged perjured testimony, he should have been granted a new trial.

We affirm.

Appellant raises these issues:

I.Did the trial court err in allowing an audio tape and tape player into the jury room during deliberation?

II. Did the trial court err in allowing the prosecutor to present evidence of uncharged misconduct and did the court err in failing to grant a mistrial?

III. Did the court err in…