Commonwealth v. McCrosson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
After appealing from a finding of a district justice and receiving a trial de novo before a court of common pleas, Kimberly Anne McCrosson was found guilty of operating a motor vehicle after her operating privileges had been revoked and before they were restored, a violation of 75 Pa.C.S. § 1543(a). On direct appeal from the judgment of sentence imposed by the trial court, McCrosson contends that the evidence failed to establish a violation of the statute. We disagree and affirm'the judgment of sentence.
Appellant failed to file post-trial motions. Generally, post-trial motions are essential…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Spain v. VicenteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- McFarlane v. HickmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Woolard v. BurtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. ParfittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MalovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Drudy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. CableCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. RosenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. Elder, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.