Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McCrosson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1990No. 1596PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

After appealing from a finding of a district justice and receiving a trial de novo before a court of common pleas, Kimberly Anne McCrosson was found guilty of operating a motor vehicle after her operating privileges had been revoked and before they were restored, a violation of 75 Pa.C.S. § 1543(a). On direct appeal from the judgment of sentence imposed by the trial court, McCrosson contends that the evidence failed to establish a violation of the statute. We disagree and affirm'the judgment of sentence.

Appellant failed to file post-trial motions. Generally, post-trial motions are essential…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spain v. VicenteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. McFarlane v. HickmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Woolard v. BurtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. ParfittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MalovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Drudy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. CableCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. RosenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. Elder, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API