Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rosenberger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 14, 1993No. 00732PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgments of sentence imposed upon Appellant after he was convicted, in a de novo trial, of two counts of driving while under suspension, DUI-related.1 Timely filed post-verdict motions were denied, and Appellant was sentenced to ninety days of incarceration and a $1,000 fine on each offense. These sentences were to run consecutively. A motion to modify sentence was denied as untimely, and a motion to reconsider that motion was denied. This direct appeal followed. We reverse.

*39At issue in the present appeal is whether Appellant can be convicted of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DarushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. NunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. SoboleskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. McCrossonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Arroyo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County1993
  2. Commonwealth v. KeeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API