Legal Opinion

McFarlane v. Hickman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 10, 1985No. 1022PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from the March 22, 1983 order entering final judgment in appellee’s favor in the amount of $1,324.35. We affirm.

On October 27, 1980, appellee Art McFarlane, t/a Art McFarlane Advertising, filed a complaint in assumpsit against appellant Eugene Hickman and the Gene Hickman Campaign Committee seeking to recover $1,480 allegedly due for services rendered in connection with appellant’s political campaign for election to the Pennsylvania Senate. Robert L. Beggs, Esquire, filed a praecipe to enter his appearance on behalf of appellant on November 14, 1980, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Brenckle v. ArblasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Dublin Sportswear v. CharlettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Spitzer v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Lovering v. Erie Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stock v. ArnottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Woolard v. BurtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Ball v. Rolling Hill HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Marcella v. Brandywine HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. McCrossonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API