Legal Opinion
Aikens v. Shalala
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 19, 1997No. Civil Action 92-2441(RMU)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
URBINA, District Judge.
Adopting in Part and Modifying in Part Magistrate Judge Alan Kay’s Report and Recommendation and Remanding the Case to the Social Security Administration
I. Introduction
This matter comes before the court upon plaintiffs (Mr. Aikens) and defendant’s (Secretary) objections to the Report and Recommendation (report) issued by Magistrate Judge Aan Kay on February 5, 1996. Pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Mr. Aikens seeks judicial review of a final decision issued by the Social Security Administration (SSA)…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Edward Lester Schronce, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Mark Hagans v. Commissioner Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- M.O. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Fund for Animals v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Anderson v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Coleman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.