Legal Opinion
M.O. v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-1695PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
The plaintiffs in this civil case, M.O., through her parents, Elizabeth Seymour and Robert Ourlian, allege that the defendant, the District of Columbia (“District”), failed to provide M.O. with the free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) to which she is entitled under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 (2006). Complaint (“Compl”) ¶¶74-80. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment, and United States Magistrate Judge John Fac-ciola issued a Report and Recommendation…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burke, Kenneth M. v. Gould, William B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Reid Ex Rel. Reid v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Alexander Kerkam v. Floretta McKenzie Superintendent, D.C. Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Q. C-C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Sciacca v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- M.G. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- McNeil v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.