Hicks v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Chief Judge:
Appellant, Adonis G. Hicks, was charged with unlawful possession with intent to distribute cocaine and phencyclidine (PCP), both in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(l) (1993). 1 Following a hearing, the trial court denied Hicks’ motion to suppress tangible evidence and statements. After a trial on the charges, the trial court found Hicks guilty of possession with intent to distribute PCP, but not guilty of the cocaine charge. 2 On appeal, Hicks argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the drugs and statements. Specifically, he contends the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Maddox v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Ball v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- ALBERT JONES v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.