Legal Opinion

C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. v. American Can Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1939No. 19948PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is a suit at law begun, prior to the effective date of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, by the issuance of a writ of summons, without the filing of any statement of claim. This procedure was in conformity with Pennsylvania practice. The summons was in trespass, which merely showed a tort action of some kind.

Then the plaintiff, still before the effective date of the new Rules, filed a bill in equity that the suit was based upon rebates or allowances which the defendant was charged with having given to customers other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. v. American Can Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. v. American Can Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Quemos Theatre Co. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
  3. Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Farmers Coop. Dairies Ass'n.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. RichDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Smith v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API