Legal Opinion

C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. v. American Can Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 1939No. 19948PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is a civil action for treble damages under the Sherman Anti-Trust Law and its amendments, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note, the Clayton Act, and the RobinsonPatman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 13-13b, 21a, particularly Sec. 13 of the last named, which relates to discrimination in prices. The suit was begun under the old practice, but its early stages need not be detailed here. See opinions of this Court, 26 F. Supp. 420; 1 F.R.D. 134. Now before the Court are: the complaint, filed in conformity with the new Rules, the plaintiff’s interrogatories, Rules of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. v. American Can Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. v. American Can Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  2. Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. RamDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1950
  3. Davis v. RomneyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Radio Corp. v. Rauland Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955
  5. Fishman v. MarcouseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API