Legal Opinion

Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. Rich

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 12610PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, District Judge.

On October 24, 1956, defendant served on plaintiffs’ counsel “Further Interrogatories.” Plaintiffs filed objections. The parties have been heard at argument and briefs have been filed. This case has been before this court on a motion to dismiss. See Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. Rich, D.C., 16 F.R.D. 472.

*113The interrogatories numbered 9 to 16, inclusive, request information as to whether certain acts have been done by the Equitable Gas Company “within the past twelve months” with respect to the replacement of sections of the pipe line at a point 2,500 feet from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hornung v. Eastern Auto. Forwarding Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951
  2. C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. v. American Can Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. RichDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sierra Berdecía v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
  2. United States v. 58.16 Acres of LandDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1975
  3. Trane Co. v. KlutznickDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1980
  4. Holt v. Southern Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969
  5. Firemen's Mutual Insurance v. Erie-Lackawanna RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API