Legal Opinion

Durphy v. Pearsall

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1907No. Civ. No. 296PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The action is based upon an alleged partnership between plaintiff and defendant. Among other things the plaintiff prays: “That an account be taken of all of said copartnership dealings and transactions from the commencement thereof and of the moneys received and paid out by plaintiff and defendant for and on account of said copartnership. ’ ’

The judgment was against defendant for $6,048.91. Defendant has appealed from the judgment and also from an order denying his motion for a new trial. These appeals are presented in separate transcripts but we shall consider them together. All the points…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. HewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Adams v. HelbingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Senior v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Albery v. GeisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API