Legal Opinion
Senior v. Anderson
California Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1903No. L.A. No. 1270PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
This is a suit to quiet the plaintiff’s title to a water-right appurtenant to their lands, described in the complaint. The claim of the plaintiffs is to the one half of the waters of San Antonio Creek, in T. 5 N., R. 22 W., S. B. M., in the county of Ventura, when not exceeding fifty inches, and is based on an appropriation made by the plaintiff Senior, October 29, 1887, he then being a homestead settler on the east half and the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter and the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section 32, same township, subsequently patented to him. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Sturr v. BeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Knight v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Senior v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Russell v. IrishIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Nicoll v. RudnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Great Oaks Water Co. v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist., California Court of Appeal, 6th District2015
- Durphy v. PearsallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Great Oaks Water Co. v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.