Abbott v. Southwest Grain Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.:
This was a proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act. At the hearing before the compensation commissioner the parties stipulated the respondent was operating under the act, the claimant was in its employ at a weekly wage of $48 or $8 per day, the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company is the insurance carrier, and oral notice of the alleged accident was received by the respondent. It is now conceded a sufficient written claim was made within time. The only evidence adduced was by *the claimant. Based on it both the commissioner and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Holler v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Matter of Grieb v. . HammerleNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Stanley v. United Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- McMillan v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Madison v. Key Work Clothes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Taylor v. Centex Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Blair v. ShawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Kauffman v. Co-Operative Refinery Assn.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Clifford v. EacrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.