Wood v. Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co.
District Court, S.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, District Judge.
This matter comes on to be heard on a motion filed by defendant to reopen the former decree of this court and permit defendant to offer newly discovered evidence tending to show anticipation of the idea disclosed in plaintiff’s patent, and, further. because it is claimed the court, in the injunction granted in favor of plaintiff, exceeded the jurisdiction of the court, in that it overlooked the Act of Congress approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. 705, c. 114 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 9465]), amending the Act of June 25, 1910.
I here quote the material portions, both of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crozier v. Fried. Krupp AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Foundation Co. v. Underpinning & Foundation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1919
- Floyd Smith Aerial Equipment Co. v. Irving Air Chute Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1921
3Cited by12 opinions
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Bereslavsky v. Esso Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Carrier Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Allgrunn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.