Legal Opinion

Allgrunn v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 3, 1928No. 34696PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Chief Justice

This is a patent case. The findings are quite voluminous and the case, notwithstanding the abnormal size of the record, not especially involved from the standpoint of facts.

The plaintiff is a skilled machinist; for over sixteen years he occupied a responsible position with the Bethlehem Steel Company in its gunshop department and had personal charge of tool making, sights, rifle heads, etc. In June, 1911, plaintiff became superintendent of the gun-finishing department of the Symington-Anderson Company, of Boch-ester, New York. This company was at the time engaged in manufacturing guns for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Gill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Parks v. BoothSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carrier Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Pocono Pines Assembly Hotels Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  3. Fulmer v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1949
  4. Ordnance Engineering Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  5. Farrand Optical Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API