Legal Opinion

Floyd Smith Aerial Equipment Co. v. Irving Air Chute Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 29, 1921No. 294-BPublishedCited by 4 opinions

in Equity. Suit by the Floyd Smith Aerial Equipment Company against the Irving Air Cliute Company.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This Is an action in equity for infringement of letters patent No. 1,340,423, granted to Floyd Smith on May 18, 1920, for a parachute or what Is known as a “lifepack,” and parachute paraphernalia for use of aviators in failing or leaping from an airship in ¡light. The device is simple in construction and of light weight. Parachutes carried in packs on the back of aviators during flights and opened up by air resistance upon jumping or falling, and parachutes of the free pack type or tied by a cord to the top of an airship and opening upon extension or stretching,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crozier v. Fried. Krupp AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Eagleton Manufacturing Co. v. West, Bradley & Carey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. George Cutter Co. v. Metropolitan Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  5. Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. SimonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wood v. Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1924
  2. Waite v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1922
  3. Luellen v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Irving Air Chute Co. v. Russell Parachute Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API