Legal Opinion

Bodtke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 18, 1994No. 2222PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Order granting the Motion for summary judgment filed by appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

Appellant queries whether the trial court erred in granting appellee’s Motion for summary judgment because the medical provider involved did not seek reconsideration of the determination by the Peer Review Organization (PRO) pursuant to Section 1797(b) of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1797(b), thus barring appellant’s cause of action. She also asserts that the determination of the PRO that her medical…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. HaugSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Lubowitz v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, Northern DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Terminato v. Pennsylvania National InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Olsofsky v. Progressive Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2001
  2. Bodtke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Carbaugh v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1999
  4. DeFazio v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1997
  5. Bodtke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API