Legal Opinion

Terminato v. Pennsylvania National Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1993No. 1489PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge.

Peer review is a procedure to evaluate disputed automobile insurance medical claims established by recent amendments to the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law.1 It enables insurers to submit such claims to an entity known as a Peer Review Organization, which determines whether the claims conform to professional standards of performance and are medically necessary. The predominant issue before us is whether a party, once the Peer Review process is invoked, must exhaust that process before proceeding to court. The lower court, relying, inter alia, on Insurance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lashe v. Northern York County School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Pennsylvania Chiropractic Federation v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Concerned Taxpayers v. Beaver County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Harcourt v. General Accident InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gemini Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Terminato v. Pennsylvania National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Barnum v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Bodtke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Frey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API