Legal Opinion

Lubowitz v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, Northern Division

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1993No. 01896PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge.

The issue is whether plaintiffs-appellants, Robyn and Jordan Lubowitz, stated a cause of action against defendantsappellees Albert Einstein Medical Center (the “Hospital”) and Dr. Martin Freedman for “fear of AIDS.” The trial court found they did not and granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

In August 1985, appellants participated in the Hospital’s in vitro fertilization program. An egg was removed from Robyn Lubowitz and was placed with a sample of her husband’s sperm into a placental serum provided by an anonymous donor. 1 The embryo was then implanted, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Ottavio v. Fibreboard Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Burk v. Sage Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Carns v. YinglingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Altiere v. Fibreboard Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Brzoska v. OlsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Giffear v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. K.A.C. v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Doe v. Philadelphia Community Health Alternatives Aids Task ForceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. John J. Marchica v. Long Island Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API