Legal Opinion
A. Hirsh, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 17, 1990No. Court 89-06-00366PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
In this action plaintiff, A. Hirsh, Inc., challenges the United States International Trade Commission’s (ITC) determination summarily denying plaintiff’s request for review, based on changed circumstances, of the Commission’s final affirmative determination under 19 U.S.C. § 1673d(b) (1988) that plaintiff’s goods threatened an industry in the United States with material injury. See Natural Bristle Paint Brushes from the People’s Republic of China, 51 Fed.Reg. 4662 (1986). In that determination the Commission found that the threat of material injury was caused by imports…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- A. Hirsh, Inc. v. The United States, and Paint Applicators Trade Action CoalitionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Chang Chun Petrochemical Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- A. Hirsh, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- A. Hirsh, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.