Legal Opinion
A. Hirsh, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 9, 1990No. Court 89-06-00366PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
Following the court’s instructions on remand in A. Hirsh, Inc. v. United States, 14 CIT -, 729 F.Supp. 1360 (1990) (Hirsh I), the International Trade Commission (ITC) filed its determination on February 12, 1990, setting forth its reasons for dismissing a request for section 751(b), 19 U.S.C. § 1675(b) (1988), changed circumstances review of an affirmative determination in Natural Bristle Paint Brushes from the People’s Republic of China, 51 Fed.Reg. 4,662 (1986). The decision before the court involves the initial step in a two-step process under section 751(b) for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Permac, Inc. And Boewe Maschinenfabrik, Gmbh, Boewe Systems & MacHinery Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Avesta AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- A. Hirsh, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Citizen Watch Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- A. Hirsh, Inc. v. The United States, and Paint Applicators Trade Action CoalitionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991