Legal Opinion

Grinde v. Tindall

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1977No. 13504PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

In a claim and delivery action tried before the district court, Fergus County, without a jury, the court found plaintiffs are entitled to the possession of certain property constituting a fuel tank installation. Defendants appeal.

During World War II the United States government constructed and placed a fueling system on land belonging to Frank and Mary Hruska. The site was adjacent to the Lewistown Air Force Base and the government entered into a lease with Hruskas for the 7 acres of land upon which the fueling system was located. The lease provided that the structures placed on the land…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Montana Electric Co. v. Northern Valley Min. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Shipler v. Potomac Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Gates v. PowellMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Interstate Manufacturing Co. v. Interstate Products Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Pritchard Petroleum Co. v. Farmers Co-Op. Oil & Supply Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Hydaburg v. Hydaburg Cooperative Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Patel v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  3. Schwend v. SchwendMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Pacific Metal Co. v. Northwestern BankMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Marriage of HoffmanMontana Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API