Legal Opinion
Claim of Petitt v. Eaton & Van Winkle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 1, 2002, which, inter alia, denied claimant’s request for full Board review of a decision ruling that claimant’s application for workers’ compensation benefits was barred by Workers’ Compensation Law § 28.
On March 4, 1993, claimant was injured in an accident caused by a malfunctioning elevator at the office building where she *823worked. It is undisputed that claimant did not file a claim for workers’ compensation benefits until January 4, 1999, almost six years after the date of her injury, at which time she averred that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Schultz v. Voltro Distributors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Schneider v. Dunkirk Ice CreamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Opdyke v. Automobile Club of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Claim of Booth v. D.V. Gonzalez Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hernandez v. Guardian Purchasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Zucker v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Faison v. City of New York Department of Human ResourcesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Claim of Firenze v. Mayflower Van LinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Dinneny v. Phoenicia Fire DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.