Legal Opinion

Claim of Dinneny v. Phoenicia Fire District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 2004Published

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 3, 2003, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a causally related injury and denied his claim for workers’ compensation benefits.

In February 1994, while working as a volunteer firefighter for the Phoenicia Fire District (hereinafter the employer), claimant fell on ice and was injured. Initially, the employer’s self insurance carrier paid total disability payments under the Volunteer Firefighters’ Benefit Law. However, at the request of the carrier, a review hearing was held in July 1996. Thereafter, by decision filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claim of the Estate of Kramer v. Ultra Blend Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Claim of Petitt v. Eaton & Van WinkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Claim of Saczawa v. United Parcel ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Claim of McCabe v. Watertown Correctional FacilityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API