Legal Opinion
Claim of Firenze v. Mayflower Van Lines
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 10, 2004, which ruled that claimant’s application for workers’ compensation benefits was time-barred.
The sole issue presented on this appeal by claimant is whether his application for workers’ compensation benefits was barred by Workers’ Compensation Law § 28. We agree with the Workers’ Compensation Board that it was.
A workers’ compensation claim that is not filed within two years of the date of the accident is untimely unless the employer’s workers’ compensation carrier has made advance payment to the claimant in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Marques v. SalgadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Petitt v. Eaton & Van WinkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Walker v. TNT Red Star ExpressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Marker v. Bell AtlanticAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by2 opinions
- Claim of Zucker v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Lavigne v. Peru Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011