Legal Opinion
M-S
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1998No. ID 3369PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3369 In re M-S-, Respondent Decided October 30, 1998 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Where an alien who did not receive oral warnings of the consequences of failing to appear at a deportation hearing pursuant to section 242B(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(a) (1994), moves to reopen deportation proceedings held in absentia under section 242B(c) of the Act in order to apply for a form of relief that was unavailable at the time of the hearing, the rescission requirements prescribed…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Carlos Humberto Ordonez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Efrain Modesto Calle-Vujiles v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Jianping Li v. KeislerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Song Jin Wu v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Afzal Hussain v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.