Legal Opinion
Cummins Financial, Inc. v. the Vessel Rose Rock River
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 15, 1991No. 90 C 20059PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of Defendants Michael L. and Carol F. Maust (hereinafter “the Mausts”), and the Vessel Rose of Rock River (hereinafter “the Vessel”), to dismiss the counterclaim of Belding Corporation. For the reasons set forth herein, the court denies Defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
On February 21, 1990, Plaintiff Cummins Financial, Inc. (hereinafter “Cummins”) filed suit in this court to foreclose on a first preferred ship mortgage which Defendants the Mausts executed to Plaintiff on July 5, 1989. The Vessel is the subject property of this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Murphy v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- B. Doe, M.D., on Behalf of B. Doe and B. Doe's Patients v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Fort WayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gammill v. BRADLEY TDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1995