Legal Opinion

Cushman v. Gephart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1884No. 10,925PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

Appellee commenced proceedings supplementary to execution against appellant Cushman, alleging that Haynes, Spencer & Co, was indebted to said Cushman.

A demuri’er was overruled to the complaint, and answers were filed denying the alleged indebtedness, and in addition thereto Haynes, Spencer & Co. filed a petition setting forth certain facts, which petition substantially stated that before the commencement of these proceedings, it (being a corporation) had purchased lumber of said Cushman of the value of $1,293.95, which.it had not paid; that before notice of these proceedings was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lord v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Burt v. HœttingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Wilcoxon v. AnnesleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Dillman v. DillmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Chandler v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Baker v. State ex rel. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Grubbs v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Gilbert v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Levering v. BimelIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Bailey v. RinkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API